From: "Francesco Bochicchio" <bockman@virgilio.it>
Subject: Re: renames and access
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 18:36:23 GMT
Date: 2004-02-12T18:36:23+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <pan.2004.02.12.18.36.09.538296@virgilio.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: wccfzdhkvw0.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com
On Wed, 11 Feb 2004 19:02:23 +0000, Robert A Duff wrote:
>
>> If this turns impossible, what would be an equivalent solution? At the
>> moment, my bet is to turn the renames into access. Any better idea?
>
> Turning into access would work, but then you have to modify all the
> clients.
Right.
> But how about this:
>
> function A return Integer is
> begin
> return REC_PTR.A;
> end A;
>
> ?
>
I thought of that:
1. It adds a function call overhead for each time one of the variables is
accessed ( and it happens a lot )
2. It only solves variable reading. I don't see any equivalent way to
assign values to the variables.
Thanks anyway.
Ciao
-----
FB
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-02-12 18:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-02-11 19:15 renames and access Francesco Bochicchio
2004-02-11 22:09 ` Randy Brukardt
2004-02-12 0:02 ` Robert A Duff
2004-02-12 18:36 ` Francesco Bochicchio [this message]
2004-02-13 8:30 ` Martin Dowie
2004-02-13 20:33 ` Robert I. Eachus
2004-02-12 2:32 ` Stephen Leake
2004-02-12 18:30 ` Francesco Bochicchio
2004-02-13 19:01 ` Georg Bauhaus
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox