From: "Luke A. Guest" <laguest@n_o_p_o_r_k_a_n_d_h_a_m.abyss2.demon.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [No_Elaboration_Code] GNAT still generating rep_to_pos, why?
Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2004 19:46:45 +0000
Date: 2004-01-02T19:46:45+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <pan.2004.01.02.19.46.44.889031@n_o_p_o_r_k_a_n_d_h_a_m.abyss2.demon.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: mailman.202.1073071924.31149.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org
On Fri, 02 Jan 2004 20:31:53 +0100, Per Sandberg wrote:
> To avoid elaboration code is quite simple, just write all your packages
> in such a way that no elaboration code is needed.
>
> The simplest way to make this hapend is to add
> "pragma pure"
Can't use pure because this package has access types and an instance of a
record type.
> or
> "pragma preelaborate"
> in all your specs.
> Then the compiler will force you to write the code in suh a way that no
> elaboration code is needed.
I tried this one, but the that code is still generated.
Thanks,
Luke.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-01-02 19:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-01-02 11:59 [No_Elaboration_Code] GNAT still generating rep_to_pos, why? Luke A. Guest
2004-01-02 17:51 ` Stephen Leake
2004-01-02 18:14 ` Luke A. Guest
2004-01-02 19:31 ` Per Sandberg
2004-01-02 19:46 ` Luke A. Guest [this message]
2004-01-02 21:17 ` Stephen Leake
2004-01-02 22:16 ` Luke A. Guest
2004-01-03 1:43 ` Stephen Leake
[not found] ` <87ekuhe5wq.fsf@news.sdbk.de>
2004-01-03 9:58 ` Luke A. Guest
2004-01-03 8:44 ` Luke A. Guest
2004-01-03 1:12 ` Robert I. Eachus
2004-01-03 8:41 ` Luke A. Guest
2004-01-03 11:53 ` Simon Wright
2004-01-03 12:20 ` Luke A. Guest
2004-01-04 12:26 ` Simon Wright
2004-01-03 1:41 ` sk
2004-01-03 2:29 ` Luke A. Guest
2004-01-03 10:48 ` Florian Weimer
2004-01-03 11:32 ` Luke A. Guest
2004-01-03 13:11 ` Florian Weimer
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox