From: "Bobby D. Bryant" <bdbryant@mail.utexas.edu>
Subject: Overhead for type conversions?
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 19:01:44 -0600
Date: 2003-07-24T19:01:44-06:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <pan.2003.07.25.01.01.43.5699@mail.utexas.edu> (raw)
Given these declarations -
type f1 is new float;
type f2 is new float;
function "*"( left : in f1; right : in f2 ) return f1 is
begin
return( left * f1( right ) );
end "*";
and given that run-time range checks are enabled, should I expect my
compiler to execute range checking code for each f1*f2 multiplication,
or will the compiler conclude from the definitions that the two types
are always convertible without error regardless of the specific value,
and thus not generate any code for a range check?
(In practice the compiler is GNAT.)
Thanks,
--
Bobby Bryant
Austin, Texas
next reply other threads:[~2003-07-25 1:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-07-25 1:01 Bobby D. Bryant [this message]
2003-07-25 2:36 ` Overhead for type conversions? Robert I. Eachus
2003-07-25 7:12 ` Bobby D. Bryant
2003-07-25 15:34 ` Matthew Heaney
2003-07-25 18:28 ` Randy Brukardt
2003-07-26 15:54 ` Nick Roberts
2003-07-26 16:01 ` Warren W. Gay VE3WWG
2003-07-26 23:39 ` Bobby D. Bryant
2003-07-27 13:41 ` Loop Optimisation [was: Overhead for type conversions?] Nick Roberts
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox