From: "Per Dalgas Jakobsen" <nospam@nospam.org>
Subject: Re: RTEMS, MaRTE or ...
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 20:27:28 +0100
Date: 2003-02-11T20:27:28+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <pan.2003.02.11.19.27.28.609982@nospam.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3E482560.40602@crs4.it
Hi Jacob :-),
> The "Linux in a Box" people seem to be able to cut the Linux kernel down
> to it's essentials. It this can work even with the real-time patches
I'm sure that Linux could do a nice job in this case too, but it might be
a bit overkill to use a fullblown(?) OS to simply launch your application
and handle some basic scheduling.
In many embedded cases I end up figuring out how to tweak the OS-drivers
to perform reliably (timing), and in some cases I end up rewriting them to
handle the events the way I need it anyway (e.g. timestamping of every
character from a serial port).
In some applications I also prefere simplicity over flexibility - If there
is no OS-driver, it can't fail.
Per
> PS: Var det ikke en id� med en Ada-aften i K�benhavn i l�bet af ugen
> 24-28/2?
PS: Jo da - Jeg er klar ;-)
(Men befinder du dig ikke p� langt-syd-for-K�ge-�en???)
prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-02-11 19:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-02-07 14:14 RTEMS, MaRTE or Per Dalgas Jakobsen
2003-02-08 2:54 ` Victor Porton
2003-02-08 3:28 ` Steve
2003-02-10 13:01 ` Colin Paul Gloster
2003-02-10 13:46 ` Per Dalgas Jakobsen
2003-02-10 22:19 ` Jacob Sparre Andersen
2003-02-11 19:27 ` Per Dalgas Jakobsen [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox