From: "Matthew Baulch" <matt@greenroom.com.au>
Subject: Re: Where did /= come from?
Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2002 17:50:37 +1100
Date: 2002-11-07T06:51:01+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <pan.2002.11.07.06.50.35.988084@greenroom.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3DC93F8B.9E28FD15@mmm.com
On Wed, 06 Nov 2002 10:12:59 +0000, Programmer Dude wrote:
> I'm learning Ada (installed GNAT and AdaGIDE last week, wrote Hello, World).
>
> I was somewhat bemused to stumble on Ada's version of "not equals": /=
>
> I'm curious about its derivation or the reason behind the lexography.
> (Perhaps a desire to use common keyboard characters?)
I'm not advocating C when I say this, but != makes far more sense than /=
lexically speaking. In C, the Negative of a bool is retrieved with !foo.
In Ada, not foo. So I believe that K&R got it right using the != operator
for 'not equal'. Ada on the other hand doesn't use the ! operator and "not
equal" is too clumsy so it could be far worse than '/='.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-11-07 6:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-11-06 16:12 Where did /= come from? Programmer Dude
2002-11-06 16:50 ` Preben Randhol
2002-11-06 17:25 ` Programmer Dude
2002-11-07 9:31 ` Preben Randhol
2002-11-07 11:19 ` David C. Hoos, Sr.
2002-11-07 11:23 ` Preben Randhol
2002-11-07 22:56 ` Programmer Dude
2002-11-08 9:43 ` Preben Randhol
2002-11-08 9:53 ` Preben Randhol
2002-11-08 19:35 ` Programmer Dude
2002-11-06 17:33 ` Robert A Duff
2002-11-06 20:17 ` Programmer Dude
2002-11-07 6:50 ` Matthew Baulch [this message]
2002-11-07 9:21 ` Preben Randhol
2002-11-08 0:23 ` news.bctel.net
2002-11-08 9:45 ` Preben Randhol
2002-11-07 14:58 ` Ted Dennison
2002-11-07 15:29 ` Frank J. Lhota
2002-11-07 22:57 ` Programmer Dude
2002-11-08 17:06 ` Frank J. Lhota
2002-11-07 15:03 ` Robert A Duff
2002-11-07 18:02 ` Vinzent Hoefler
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox