Re: ANNOUNCE: Free-NET

["Vortex Vandel" <vv@spanner.net>]

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1009 bytes --]


"Gerhard H�ring" <gerhard.nospam@bigfoot.de> wrote in message
news:3A58AFF3.C67CAB11@bigfoot.de...
> Yes, but how does this have anything to do with Microsoft .NET?
> Interfacing different languages via a message queue thru stdin/stdout? I
> do not understand how you can compare that with Microsoft's .NET
> technology. The core of .NET is the Common Language Runtime, and there
> is already a competitor for this: it's called the Java platform :-)
> Please elaborate on how you plan to implement a .NET equivalent.

This looks really dumb (or is it just me?) why can't you use the commands
with out giveing them to some server? is this a really dodgy multi threading
with out multi threadding?(sort of the art of fighting with out fighting? :)

also what is this .net crud that is the "new" buzzword.. some one mentioned
it.. and I can't remember what he said :) some thing about a new message que
to replace interprocess communications or some thing? but it's for multi
computers or some thing?