From: "SteveD" <nospam_steved94@attbi.com>
Subject: Re: C.A.R. Hoare on liability
Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2002 02:55:17 GMT
Date: 2002-06-22T02:55:17+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <pGRQ8.105617$R61.37336@rwcrnsc52.ops.asp.att.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 5ee5b646.0206210355.3533be8f@posting.google.com
"Robert Dewar" <dewar@gnat.com> wrote in message
news:5ee5b646.0206210355.3533be8f@posting.google.com...
[snip]
>
> First, runtime checks can be deadly if you have not done proper analysis
> of how they can be handled, since they can turn trivial errors that would
> not intefere with overall correct function into disasters (Ariane5 is
> an example of this in action).
>
Of course the errors detected by runtime checks might not be trivial errors
as well. I can recall a case where an occasional overflow in calculations
in an old FORTRAN program caused some very large machinery to move to a very
awkward position.
As you say there is no substitute for doing a proper analysis.
SteveD
prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-06-22 2:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-06-17 16:09 C.A.R. Hoare on liability Wes Groleau
2002-06-19 16:14 ` Mike Silva
2002-06-19 16:57 ` Darren New
2002-06-19 18:03 ` Larry Kilgallen
2002-06-19 17:54 ` Wes Groleau
2002-06-20 13:05 ` Marin David Condic
2002-06-21 14:31 ` Wes Groleau
2002-06-21 16:47 ` Marin David Condic
2002-06-21 11:55 ` Robert Dewar
2002-06-21 20:45 ` Robert I. Eachus
2002-06-22 13:14 ` Robert Dewar
2002-06-22 13:36 ` Jack Flynn
2002-06-22 16:47 ` Mark Biggar
2002-06-23 15:47 ` Robert I. Eachus
2002-06-22 2:55 ` SteveD [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox