From: "Jeffrey R. Carter" <spam.not.jrcarter@acm.not.spam.org>
Subject: Re: AW: GNAT compiler switches and optimization
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 20:29:09 GMT
Date: 2006-10-23T20:29:09+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <pC9%g.250424$1i1.224095@attbi_s72> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <wccpscij146.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
Robert A Duff wrote:
>
> I certainly do not think you should start putting Convention(Fortran) on
> all your performance-critical arrays, just to make sure!
In the case of records, the representation is up to the compiler unless
there is a representation clause. I don't find it surprising that the
same is true of arrays. However, as with records, there should be some
way to specify the representation for arrays other than a pragma
Convention for another language.
--
Jeff Carter
"Blessed are they who convert their neighbors'
oxen, for they shall inhibit their girth."
Monty Python's Life of Brian
83
prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-10-23 20:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-23 12:46 AW: GNAT compiler switches and optimization Grein, Christoph (Fa. ESG)
2006-10-23 17:06 ` Warner BRUNS
2006-10-23 17:42 ` tmoran
2006-10-23 19:14 ` Robert A Duff
2006-10-23 20:29 ` Jeffrey R. Carter [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox