From: "Randy Brukardt" <randy@rrsoftware.com>
Subject: Re: representation clauses ok in generics when the formal type in tagged with known ancestor, but not ok when only know to be tagged ? ... said the compiler.
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2018 18:59:50 -0500
Date: 2018-03-27T18:59:50-05:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <p9eltm$pc5$1@franka.jacob-sparre.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 83ad49fb-1a17-4dc6-a717-0a350e61bcbf@googlegroups.com
If you're a customer, I'd report it and let them give you an answer. That's
what you pay them for.
If you're not a customer, I'd still report it but don't expect an answer in
any particular time.
Randy.
"Jean-Claude Rostaing" <00120260a@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:83ad49fb-1a17-4dc6-a717-0a350e61bcbf@googlegroups.com...
> How can I know if I shall report this to Adacore or not ?
> It would be my first time. I anticipate and think of a special ritual or
> somethin', you see :-D
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-27 23:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-24 17:16 representation clauses ok in generics when the formal type in tagged with known ancestor, but not ok when only know to be tagged ? ... said the compiler Mehdi Saada
2018-03-26 22:31 ` Randy Brukardt
2018-03-27 13:57 ` Jean-Claude Rostaing
2018-03-27 23:59 ` Randy Brukardt [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox