From: "Jeffrey R. Carter" <spam.jrcarter.not@spam.not.acm.org>
Subject: Re: non record limited type
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 17:45:49 +0100
Date: 2018-02-22T17:45:49+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <p6ms3t$jqf$1@dont-email.me> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fb3b3119-8229-4e34-8b22-7043f47e7b07@googlegroups.com>
On 02/22/2018 01:09 AM, Mehdi Saada wrote:
> Yet, we still wonder why "type FOO is limited INTEGER" is not legal. Would be useful.
For what?
--
Jeff Carter
"[A] brilliant military career that after thirty
years catapulted him to the rank of corporal."
Take the Money and Run
138
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-22 16:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-21 15:58 non record limited type Mehdi Saada
2018-02-21 21:42 ` Jere
2018-02-21 22:29 ` Mehdi Saada
2018-02-21 23:08 ` Jere
2018-02-21 23:14 ` Jere
2018-02-22 0:09 ` Mehdi Saada
2018-02-22 0:26 ` Mehdi Saada
2018-02-22 2:57 ` Jere
2018-02-22 16:45 ` Jeffrey R. Carter [this message]
2018-02-22 17:06 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2018-02-22 7:56 ` Simon Wright
2018-02-22 1:20 ` Randy Brukardt
2018-02-22 1:29 ` Randy Brukardt
2018-02-22 8:25 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2018-02-22 23:24 ` Randy Brukardt
2018-02-23 8:58 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox