From: "Alejandro R. Mosteo" <alejandro@mosteo.com>
Subject: Re: interfaces and limited/controlled/limited-controlled types
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2018 12:17:29 +0100
Date: 2018-01-26T12:17:29+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <p4f2oa$c4u$1@dont-email.me> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <p4eoqq$1l2v$1@gioia.aioe.org>
On 26/01/18 09:28, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote:
> On 26/01/2018 05:58, Randy Brukardt wrote:
>> "Mehdi Saada" <00120260a@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:ea190839-2f83-4dbb-9064-8d6f535cc1d0@googlegroups.com...
>>> (...)
> However having an ability to add finalization
> later would be an indispensable feature. Existing workarounds are not
> good at all.
Agreed.
> BTW, was it considered to add new interfaces without making existing
> base types members of?
I just was lamenting myself recently for not recalling this idea for the
next revision. Just add new interfaces with the same semantics.
I wonder if there are technical problems besides having a duplicated
feature.
-Alex.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-26 11:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-25 16:21 interfaces and limited/controlled/limited-controlled types Mehdi Saada
2018-01-25 22:00 ` Robert Eachus
2018-01-26 4:58 ` Randy Brukardt
2018-01-26 8:28 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2018-01-26 11:17 ` Alejandro R. Mosteo [this message]
2018-01-27 7:12 ` Randy Brukardt
2018-01-27 14:04 ` Jere
2018-01-27 14:38 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2018-01-27 18:28 ` Jere
2018-01-29 23:05 ` Randy Brukardt
2018-01-29 23:03 ` Randy Brukardt
2018-01-31 11:54 ` Alejandro R. Mosteo
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox