From: "Jeffrey R. Carter" <spam.jrcarter.not@spam.not.acm.org>
Subject: Re: ADA 95 Best Practices Book
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2018 18:21:54 +0100
Date: 2018-01-24T18:21:54+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <p4afbj$tnj$1@dont-email.me> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <82ac2279-1f90-4b11-babd-b4fe81bcd86a@googlegroups.com>
On 01/24/2018 02:19 AM, MichaelD_4321@aol.com wrote:
>
> How different are the ADA 95 compilers on Linux versus Windows? Which is better.
Is that the American Dental Association or the Australian Desert Anteaters? Ada
is a woman's name, not an acronym.
Ada-95 compilers can be very different between vendors, even on the same
platform. For example, GNAT uses a source-file-name based approach to finding
the source for compilation units on all platforms it supports, while Janu/Ada
(Windows only) uses a compilation-library approach. The former is a bit harder
to use if you don't want to use the default naming rules, but a bit easier to
invoke if you do. The former is more flexible about file names and allows
multiple compilation units in a single file, but may require an extra step
before you can compile things.
--
Jeff Carter
"You couldn't catch clap in a brothel, silly English K...niggets."
Monty Python & the Holy Grail
19
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-24 17:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-24 1:15 ADA 95 Best Practices Book MichaelD4321@aol.com
2018-01-24 1:19 ` MichaelD_4321@aol.com
2018-01-24 7:23 ` Petter Fryklund
2018-01-24 7:42 ` Niklas Holsti
2018-01-24 17:21 ` Jeffrey R. Carter [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox