Re: Full view of a private partial view cannot be a subtype

["Jeffrey R. Carter" <spam.jrcarter.not@spam.not.acm.org>]

On 12/06/2017 01:54 PM, Jere wrote:
>>
> I don't think we will ever agree on this topic, because, having grown up as
> someone with trouble reading, I had to find alternate methods to parse
> through what I saw.  It's easy to get overwhelmed when there is so much
> to read/go through.  What's readable to you isn't necessarily readable to me.

S/W is too important for those who are busy creating new buffer-overflow errors 
to be allowed to do it. If we're lucky, that will change. If it does, when we're 
applying for approval, I'd think that a history of violating S/W-engineering 
principles would not be a selling point.

> Hopefully we can just agree to disagree.

Not going to happen. You'll come around to my way of thinking or I shall taunt 
you a second time.

-- 
Jeff Carter
"I fart in your general direction."
Monty Python & the Holy Grail
05