From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de>
Subject: Re: A trouble with different instantiations of generic packages
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 10:04:31 +0100
Date: 2017-11-29T10:04:31+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ovlt6v$1rjd$2@gioia.aioe.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: ovl1ji$fi4$1@gioia.aioe.org
On 29/11/2017 02:13, Victor Porton wrote:
> Yes, to use formal generic packages seems a solution.
Or to use generic children packages:
generic
type T is ...;
package A is
...
end A;
generic
package A.B is ... -- This one goes with the same T
...
end A.B;
These are two competing approaches.
--
Regards,
Dmitry A. Kazakov
http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-29 9:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-28 23:22 A trouble with different instantiations of generic packages Victor Porton
2017-11-29 1:13 ` Victor Porton
2017-11-29 9:04 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox