From: Victor Porton <porton@narod.ru>
Subject: Re: Home-made bingings or Florist?
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2017 17:50:01 +0200
Date: 2017-11-21T17:50:01+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ov1hvj$1an8$1@gioia.aioe.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: oussh3$1b1r$1@gioia.aioe.org
Victor Porton wrote:
> What would you recommend for a program which needs to bind some small
> subset of Posix functions: Florist or my own bindings of a few functions
> using Import aspect or pragma?
>
> The bound functions are currently intended ONLY for spawning subprocesses
> with given stdin and receiving the subprocess stdout. I hope otherwise
> stay in standard Ada for this project, without using more Posix bindings,
> but the real requests may vary in the future.
>
> I use Ada2012.
I think I should bind myself. My program would then be more likely to work
on a system with partial POSIX support (e.g. Windows), because I bind only
these POSIX functions which are necessary for my program.
--
Victor Porton - http://portonvictor.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-21 15:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-19 21:19 Home-made bingings or Florist? Victor Porton
2017-11-19 21:23 ` Luke A. Guest
2017-11-19 22:10 ` Victor Porton
2017-11-20 1:51 ` Luke A. Guest
2017-11-20 16:25 ` Victor Porton
2017-11-20 17:26 ` Spiros Bousbouras
2017-11-21 15:50 ` Victor Porton [this message]
2017-11-22 12:32 ` Maciej Sobczak
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox