Re: More reliable compilers (of some programming langauges) than GNAT

[Victor Porton <porton@narod.ru>]

AdaMagica wrote:

> Am Dienstag, 21. November 2017 16:07:47 UTC+1 schrieb Victor Porton:
>> Ada is good.
>> 
>> But I have caught a few GNAT bugs while writing my software. It is too
>> bad.
>> 
>> Would you recommend me another language (not Ada) which has a quality
>> free compiler?
> 
> compilers free of quality should be abundant for languages galore.

What

"free of quality"?

or maybe you meant "free and quality"?

What did you mean?

>> I need linking with C (like Ada Convention=>C), threads, containers
>> library, and if possible reliability.
>> 
>> Maybe should I switch to C++? Is C++ compiler more reliable than GNAT?
>> 
>> I also heard of D and Swift. Huh?
>> 
>> Java?
>> 
>> Or (oh, oh, oh) plain C?
>> 
>> --
>> Victor Porton - http://portonvictor.org
-- 
Victor Porton - http://portonvictor.org