* Storage pools and generic access types
@ 2017-10-13 23:12 Victor Porton
2017-10-21 0:50 ` Randy Brukardt
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Victor Porton @ 2017-10-13 23:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
Suppose we have a generic package with an access type argument.
Do I assume correctly that "new" in the generic package will use
'Storage_Pool if it is specified for the access type given as generic
argument?
--
Victor Porton - http://portonvictor.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: Storage pools and generic access types
2017-10-13 23:12 Storage pools and generic access types Victor Porton
@ 2017-10-21 0:50 ` Randy Brukardt
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Randy Brukardt @ 2017-10-21 0:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
Yes, of course. - Randy
"Victor Porton" <porton@narod.ru> wrote in message
news:orrh9b$p3d$1@gioia.aioe.org...
> Suppose we have a generic package with an access type argument.
>
> Do I assume correctly that "new" in the generic package will use
> 'Storage_Pool if it is specified for the access type given as generic
> argument?
>
> --
> Victor Porton - http://portonvictor.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-10-21 0:50 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-10-13 23:12 Storage pools and generic access types Victor Porton
2017-10-21 0:50 ` Randy Brukardt
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox