From: "Björn Lundin" <b.f.lundin@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Why does Ada compile slower than Python?
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 09:34:10 +0200
Date: 2017-10-18T09:34:10+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <os705h$njs$1@dont-email.me> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <os6uv5$1a12$1@gioia.aioe.org>
On 2017-10-18 09:13, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote:
> Another contributor is catastrophic performance of GNU linker. It takes
> about an hour just to link a large stand-alone library.
He, that is one reason we left ObjectAda (7.2 I think) on Windows 12
years ago.
It could take longer than so to link our executables
With gnat, it was fantastic, linking went down to a couple of minutes.
And still is, even if the exe-size is between 70 and 200 mb
on 32bit Aix (ppc), 32-bit Win (intel) and 64-bit Linux (intel)
How large is your library?
But on the pi - yes it takes quite som time.
But a modern Pi has is roughly the same umpf as a 2002-server,
--
--
Björn
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-18 7:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-02 23:01 Why does Ada compile slower than Python? Victor Porton
2017-10-03 0:05 ` Leff Ivanov
2017-10-03 1:11 ` gautier_niouzes
2017-10-03 11:31 ` Brian Drummond
2017-10-03 20:14 ` Randy Brukardt
2017-10-03 21:23 ` gautier_niouzes
2017-10-03 13:07 ` bartc
2017-10-03 13:41 ` G.B.
2017-10-03 21:08 ` Victor Porton
2017-10-04 15:00 ` Simon Wright
2017-10-18 5:56 ` olivermkellogg
2017-10-18 6:38 ` Paul Rubin
2017-10-18 7:13 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2017-10-18 7:34 ` Björn Lundin [this message]
2017-10-18 8:02 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2017-10-20 6:25 ` gautier_niouzes
2017-10-04 0:21 ` Mace Ayres
2017-10-04 1:51 ` Andrew Shvets
2017-10-04 1:54 ` Andrew Shvets
2017-10-04 15:47 ` gautier_niouzes
2017-10-04 16:03 ` Victor Porton
2017-10-07 11:47 ` Blady
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox