From: Victor Porton <porton@narod.ru>
Subject: Re: Allocators design flaw
Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2017 18:18:46 +0300
Date: 2017-10-14T18:18:46+03:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ort9sv$1oaf$1@gioia.aioe.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: ort6qu$1iul$2@gioia.aioe.org
Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote:
> On 2017-10-14 16:03, Victor Porton wrote:
>> Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote:
>>
>>> On 2017-10-14 04:53, Victor Porton wrote:
>>>> It is impossible to properly implement an allocator through a C
>>>> function (such as raptor_alloc_memory() from Raptor C library) which
>>>> allocates a struct and returns the pointer to the allocated struct.
>>>>
>>>> It is because RM13.11(21.5/3) "The Alignment parameter is a nonzero
>>>> integral multiple of D'Alignment..."
>>>>
>>>> (If it were "The Alignment parameter is equal to D'Alignment", then we
>>>> would be able just to check (in Allocate procedure implementation) that
>>>>
>>>> pragma Assert(Dummy_Record'Alignment mod Alignment = 0);
>>>> -- where Dummy_Record is an arbitrary C-convention record
>>>> -- (as all C records have the same alignment reqs)
>>>>
>>>> So Alignment parameter may be arbitrarily big and the C function
>>>> alignment may not conform to it.
>>>
>>> Usually allocators return addresses already rounded and there is nothing
>>> to worry about.
>>>
>>>> Let us think how to work around (in Ada 202x) of this design flaw.
>>>
>>> If any it is _alloc_memory() flaw, not Ada's.
>>>
>>> Add max alignment + log max alignment - 1 to the desired size. Add log
>>> max alignment to the returned address and round to the required
>>> alignment. Place the offset to original address in front (log alignment
>>> length). Return the rounded address. When freed use the stored offset to
>>> get the original address.
>>
>> As far as I understand, it will not work, because the C library I am
>> writing bindings for may try to free an object allocated by me (or I my
>> need to free an object allocated by the library).
>
> The last sentence describes freeing memory, i.e. for Deallocate.
I again state that we need the C function *_free() to free memory. But it is
impossible in your scenario, because you change the pointer to point to
another byte of memory.
--
Victor Porton - http://portonvictor.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-14 15:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-14 2:53 Allocators design flaw Victor Porton
2017-10-14 7:27 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2017-10-14 13:52 ` Victor Porton
2017-10-14 14:25 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2017-10-14 14:03 ` Victor Porton
2017-10-14 14:26 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2017-10-14 15:18 ` Victor Porton [this message]
2017-10-14 15:44 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2017-10-14 16:42 ` Victor Porton
2017-10-14 16:13 ` Simon Wright
2017-10-14 16:38 ` Victor Porton
2017-10-14 14:12 ` Victor Porton
2017-10-14 14:20 ` Victor Porton
2017-10-14 14:24 ` Victor Porton
2017-10-14 14:36 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2017-10-14 15:17 ` Victor Porton
2017-10-14 15:51 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2017-10-14 16:34 ` Victor Porton
2017-10-14 17:14 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2017-10-14 17:24 ` Victor Porton
2017-10-14 18:08 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2017-10-14 14:28 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2017-10-14 15:14 ` Victor Porton
2017-10-14 15:42 ` Simon Wright
2017-10-14 16:29 ` Victor Porton
2017-10-14 20:07 ` Simon Wright
2017-10-14 21:26 ` Victor Porton
2017-10-21 1:42 ` Randy Brukardt
2017-10-14 8:02 ` Simon Wright
2017-10-14 13:59 ` Victor Porton
2017-10-14 14:35 ` Simon Wright
2017-10-14 15:11 ` Victor Porton
2017-10-14 15:56 ` Simon Wright
2017-10-14 16:22 ` Victor Porton
2017-10-29 16:01 ` David Thompson
2017-10-14 14:11 ` Victor Porton
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox