From: "Ed Falis" <falis@verizon.net>
Subject: Re: Under which category of types in the ARM do Natural and Positive fall?
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 18:02:15 GMT
Date: 2004-09-16T18:02:15+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <opseflph1k5afhvo@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: dJGdnekpIcpHT9TcRVn-pA@megapath.net
On Thu, 16 Sep 2004 12:53:34 -0500, Randy Brukardt <randy@rrsoftware.com>
wrote:
> Oh, wow, that was a joke? I think it needed a roadmap - thanks for
> giving us
> one.
Hey, I didn't put it there, but I did get it. :-P
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-09-16 18:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-09-13 13:04 Under which category of types in the ARM do Natural and Positive fall? matthias_k
2004-09-13 13:49 ` Peter Amey
2004-09-15 19:31 ` Under which category of types in the ARM do Natural and Positivefall? Joe Simon
2004-09-16 13:28 ` Under which category of types in the ARM do Natural and Positive fall? David C. Hoos
2004-09-16 15:40 ` Ed Falis
2004-09-16 17:53 ` Randy Brukardt
2004-09-16 18:02 ` Ed Falis [this message]
2004-09-16 23:05 ` Dale Stanbrough
2004-09-13 13:49 ` Björn Persson
2004-09-13 14:00 ` Martin Dowie
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox