From: "Nick Roberts" <nick.roberts@acm.org>
Subject: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP
Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2004 01:46:58 +0100
Date: 2004-08-21T01:46:58+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <opsc14gkmvp4pfvb@bram-2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: kpcci01smbd7l757ge3hpumnura305b5kg@4ax.com
On Fri, 20 Aug 2004 12:23:40 -0500, Programmer Dude <Chris@Sonnack.com>
wrote:
>> I personally like Smalltalk.
>
> Ditto. I borrowed some of it's more interesting ideas for
> my own language, BOOL.
Would you say a bit more about this language (BOOL), please.
--
Nick Roberts
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-21 0:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <Xns954A6B267F42Fcristianosadunhotmai@130.133.1.4>
[not found] ` <memo.20040819213812.1988A@brangdon.m>
[not found] ` <Xns954B81678A9D6cristianosadunhotmai@130.133.1.4>
2004-08-20 17:15 ` Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP Richard Riehle
2004-08-20 17:23 ` Programmer Dude
2004-08-21 0:46 ` Nick Roberts [this message]
2004-09-03 20:10 ` Programmer Dude
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox