From: "Nick Roberts" <nick.roberts@acm.org>
Subject: Re: Specifying parameter passing convention and place (register)
Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2004 22:50:32 +0100
Date: 2004-07-09T22:50:32+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <opsav4aijep4pfvb@bram-2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: lnoemo6f8a.fsf@nuthaus.mib.org
On Fri, 09 Jul 2004 21:29:08 GMT, Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> wrote:
> ...
> It seems counterintuitive to associate the parameter
> passing method with a subtype rather than with a formal
> parameter.
>
> What about something like this?
>
> function Wibble (N: in Integer);
> for Wibble'Parameter_Passing use ( N => EAX );
>
> Adjust names and syntax to taste.
I agree, and I've outlined a scheme in another post in this thread.
--
Nick Roberts
prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-07-09 21:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-07-05 23:25 Specifying parameter passing convention and place (register) Nick Roberts
2004-07-06 12:58 ` Larry Kilgallen
2004-07-06 17:30 ` Nick Roberts
2004-07-07 4:14 ` Larry Kilgallen
2004-07-07 13:13 ` Nick Roberts
2004-07-07 18:54 ` Larry Kilgallen
2004-07-07 21:01 ` Nick Roberts
2004-07-08 12:06 ` Larry Kilgallen
2004-07-08 15:29 ` Nick Roberts
2004-07-08 14:09 ` Bob Spooner
2004-07-08 18:10 ` Nick Roberts
2004-07-08 12:27 ` Georg Bauhaus
2004-07-08 15:38 ` Larry Kilgallen
2004-07-08 18:03 ` Georg Bauhaus
2004-07-09 21:29 ` Keith Thompson
2004-07-09 21:50 ` Nick Roberts [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox