From: "Nick Roberts" <nick.roberts@acm.org>
Subject: Re: Specifying parameter passing convention and place (register)
Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2004 19:10:46 +0100
Date: 2004-07-08T19:10:46+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <opsatzf8wep4pfvb@bram-2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: ccjki7$11km$1@f04n12.cac.psu.edu
On Thu, 8 Jul 2004 10:09:06 -0400, Bob Spooner <rls19@psu.edu> wrote:
> Nick,
>
> If you look at the parameter passing mechanisms available when using
> interface pragmas such as Export_Procedure, you may be able to specify
> what
> you want.
Thanks Bob, but the options there don't seem to allow specification of the
'place' (register or location in the stack frame) to pass a parameter (or
return result). I outlined a couple of pragmas I might use in a sibling
message in this thread.
--
Nick Roberts
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-07-08 18:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-07-05 23:25 Specifying parameter passing convention and place (register) Nick Roberts
2004-07-06 12:58 ` Larry Kilgallen
2004-07-06 17:30 ` Nick Roberts
2004-07-07 4:14 ` Larry Kilgallen
2004-07-07 13:13 ` Nick Roberts
2004-07-07 18:54 ` Larry Kilgallen
2004-07-07 21:01 ` Nick Roberts
2004-07-08 12:06 ` Larry Kilgallen
2004-07-08 15:29 ` Nick Roberts
2004-07-08 14:09 ` Bob Spooner
2004-07-08 18:10 ` Nick Roberts [this message]
2004-07-08 12:27 ` Georg Bauhaus
2004-07-08 15:38 ` Larry Kilgallen
2004-07-08 18:03 ` Georg Bauhaus
2004-07-09 21:29 ` Keith Thompson
2004-07-09 21:50 ` Nick Roberts
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox