From: Nick Roberts <nickroberts@blueyonder.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Unchecked_Deallocation subtleties
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 16:04:38 +0100
Date: 2003-04-10T16:04:38+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <oprne5h0vybqmqul@news.cis.dfn.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <oprndn2ktgbqmqul@news.cis.dfn.de>
On Wed, 09 Apr 2003 20:50:34 +0100, Nick Roberts
<nickroberts@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
>> I'm looking at an implementation which will call user-defined
>> Deallocate, whether X is null or not. Is it correct?
>
> I believe this implementation is 'right'. It is certainly right if the
> module which contains the user-defined deallocation also chooses the
> representation(s) of a null pointer. Generally, is will be for the user-
> defined Deallocate to test if the access value is null, and do nothing
> (as the RM specifies) if it is.
To reiterate, please cancel this opinion!
I was either thinking of something else entirely or just inebriated.
--
Nick Roberts
Jabber: debater@charente.de [ICQ: 159718630]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-04-10 15:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-04-09 9:10 Unchecked_Deallocation subtleties Piotr Zgorecki
2003-04-09 9:46 ` Samuel Tardieu
2003-04-09 12:19 ` Marin David Condic
2003-04-09 12:37 ` Samuel Tardieu
2003-04-10 12:02 ` Marin David Condic
2003-04-09 16:54 ` Warren W. Gay VE3WWG
2003-04-09 20:19 ` Nick Roberts
2003-04-09 21:39 ` Samuel Tardieu
2003-04-10 11:37 ` Nick Roberts
2003-04-10 14:39 ` Robert Spooner
2003-04-10 16:39 ` Warren W. Gay VE3WWG
2003-04-09 19:50 ` Nick Roberts
2003-04-10 15:04 ` Nick Roberts [this message]
2003-04-10 16:40 ` chris.danx
2003-04-14 23:42 ` Keith Thompson
2003-04-15 1:54 ` Nick Roberts
2003-04-15 12:00 ` Larry Kilgallen
2003-04-15 12:13 ` Jacob Sparre Andersen
2003-04-19 8:57 ` AG
2003-04-09 21:23 ` Randy Brukardt
2003-04-10 11:49 ` Nick Roberts
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox