From: "Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57)" <yannick_duchene@yahoo.fr>
Subject: Re: Question[s] about aliased extended return.
Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2012 22:44:15 +0100
Date: 2012-11-09T22:44:15+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <op.wnizz1nvule2fv@cardamome> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 77906f56-8ea0-4d87-8ace-4db1172958cd@googlegroups.com
Le Fri, 09 Nov 2012 21:53:13 +0100, <sbelmont700@gmail.com> a écrit:
> In either case, I'm always of the opinion that the 'thin' binding should
> match the API and just change types (pointers to arrays, etc), and the
> 'thick' binding should change the structure (procedures to functions,
> return codes to exceptions, etc).
>
> -ab
Just out of curiosity, for a thin binding, would reuse the names used in
the API or would you change names only in a tick binding? (most of times,
I feel API names are not nice to read).
--
“Syntactic sugar causes cancer of the semi-colons.” [1]
“Structured Programming supports the law of the excluded muddle.” [1]
[1]: Epigrams on Programming — Alan J. — P. Yale University
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-16 9:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-02 15:55 Question[s] about aliased extended return Shark8
2012-11-09 0:43 ` Randy Brukardt
2012-11-09 3:40 ` Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57)
2012-11-10 7:34 ` Randy Brukardt
2012-11-09 19:42 ` Shark8
2012-11-09 20:53 ` sbelmont700
2012-11-09 21:44 ` Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57) [this message]
2012-11-09 22:04 ` sbelmont700
2012-11-09 22:56 ` Shark8
2012-11-09 22:54 ` Shark8
2012-11-10 7:27 ` Randy Brukardt
2012-11-10 16:08 ` Shark8
2012-11-10 1:08 ` Jeffrey Carter
2012-11-10 1:52 ` Shark8
2012-11-10 2:17 ` Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57)
2012-11-10 10:59 ` Bill Findlay
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox