From: "Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57)" <yannick_duchene@yahoo.fr>
Subject: Re: Class wide preconditions: error in the Ada 2012 Rationale?
Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2012 02:32:21 +0100
Date: 2012-11-09T02:32:21+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <op.wnhfv7yjule2fv@cardamome> (raw)
In-Reply-To: k7hkeh$kuu$1@munin.nbi.dk
Le Fri, 09 Nov 2012 01:57:51 +0100, Randy Brukardt <randy@rrsoftware.com>
a écrit:
> My rule of thumb is that in a given derivation chain, you should only use
> one or the other.
I fully agree, and was thinking of the same conclusion.
> (I wanted to make that a requirement, but that was shot down.)
How shot down? (if the question is not too much inquisitive)
--
“Syntactic sugar causes cancer of the semi-colons.” [1]
“Structured Programming supports the law of the excluded muddle.” [1]
[1]: Epigrams on Programming — Alan J. — P. Yale University
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-16 8:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-05 20:41 Class wide preconditions: error in the Ada 2012 Rationale? Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57)
2012-11-05 20:43 ` Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57)
2012-11-06 1:04 ` sbelmont700
2012-11-09 0:57 ` Randy Brukardt
2012-11-09 1:32 ` Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57) [this message]
2012-11-09 2:13 ` Randy Brukardt
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox