Re: copyright questions

["Vasiliy Molostov" <molostoff@gmail.com>]

Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57) <yannick_duchene@yahoo.fr> писал(а) в своём  
письме Wed, 15 Aug 2012 04:49:35 +0400:

> Le Wed, 15 Aug 2012 01:46:21 +0200, Vasiliy Molostov  
> <molostoff@gmail.com> a écrit:
> However, if you know an example of a copyrighted math proof or invention

Perhaps any, since they are writings (recordings) and at least
a right for authorship (which is a part of copyright) belongs to the  
respective author. You can not issue or release formula or formulation  
under your name that was not invented (written) by you without original  
author approval,
this right belongs to the original author. (But you might still claim that  
you have invented the same at the same time). A good example for copy  
restrictions are US domestic cryptography algorithms that are usually not  
for export.

And for this reason it's formally better to receive some transition of  
that "right to copy"
 from original works used in fortran's Lapack & Blas (on the amount that  
really just copied).
For derivatives from a public work (e.g. released to public) it is enough  
to place a reference on such one, so we can gratefully establish original  
authorship, but indeed Ada2012 version is a new writing (recording) and  
thus - this version has its own authorship and copyright, while formulas  
and formulations are belongs to original Lapack & Blas (i suppose - public  
ones).

Interestingly, that Morse has patented his coding (signalling) system, as  
a process of communication (since applied 'use') that obviously shows how  
to pour out this matter from one kind into another.

Of course these talks are just perfunctory inspections, since we are not  
civil code lawyers, but this knowledge is useful, even as a perfunctory.  
For a serious deal it is better to visit real lawyer.


>
> Cheers
>
>


-- 
Написано в почтовом клиенте браузера Opera: http://www.opera.com/mail/