Re: Ada.Calendar and NTP (and Unix Epoch)

["Vasiliy Molostov" <molostoff@gmail.com>]

Dmitry A. Kazakov <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> писал(а) в своём письме Wed,  
25 Jul 2012 11:33:17 +0400:

> On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 11:04:05 +0400, Vasiliy Molostov wrote:
>
>> Dmitry A. Kazakov <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> писал(а) в своём письме  
>> Wed,
>> 25 Jul 2012 10:32:05 +0400:
>>
>>>> If you can synchronize representations, you are a god of time
>>>> representations.
>>>
>>> Synchronization does not necessarily means that you control the clocks.
>>
>> Do you see the terminology diff: "time represented"  and "time valued"?
>> Why you insist on false obvious mistake you follow due to this  
>> difference?
>
> There is certainly no such thing as "time value." What is the point?

It is the source of time representation.

>> As for ai05-0119-1, do you understand that calculating linear algebra
>> equation with n variables can give you a complex number in the answer?
>
> No, it does not, provided you meant real coefficients. A solution of  
> such a
> set of linear equations is real when exists. When does not exist. It also
> does not in the field of complex numbers.

I meant complex, that giving simple arithmetic calculus you have got  
complex answer. I can only guess, that this came from speculative imply of  
some variables that are not reflected in the expression.


>


-- 
Написано в почтовом клиенте браузера Opera: http://www.opera.com/mail/