Re: Hint for users of AdaDep (-m, -o, -r and -w options)

["Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57)" <yannick_duchene@yahoo.fr>]

Le Tue, 05 Jun 2012 08:33:54 +0200, Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57)  
<yannick_duchene@yahoo.fr> a écrit:

> Hi happy AdaDep users,
>
> Don't know if this was already noticed somewhere, but I've just noticed  
> some care must be taken when one use the “-w“ option in a specific  
> circumstance: this option direct the adadep command to overwrite the  
> output file specified by the “-o <file>” option. If you do so *with* the  
> “-r” option *without* the “-m” option, you will a get an output file  
> looking like truncated. The output file will be overwritten for each  
> processed units spec' and body. When the “-m” option is specified, this  
> undesired behavior is not exposed.
>
> Conclusion: if you use the options “-o” “-r” and “-w” all together,  
> always serve it with an “-m” option (this will also prevent you from  
> erroneously suspecting a bug in adadep ;-) ).

Oh, shit! I wanted to say AdaDep (sorry for the wrong thread's title). In  
the above, replace all adactl occurrences, by adadep (that's me, which is  
buggy). Fixed in the quote.

-- 
“Syntactic sugar causes cancer of the semi-colons.” [1]
“Structured Programming supports the law of the excluded muddle.” [1]
[1]: Epigrams on Programming — Alan J. — P. Yale University