Re: Fuzzy machine learning framework v1.2

["Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57)" <yannick_duchene@yahoo.fr>]

Le Sat, 02 Jun 2012 16:44:59 +0200, darkestkhan <darkestkhan@gmail.com> a  
écrit:
> define:fraudulent
> 1. Obtained, done by, or involving deception, esp. criminal deception:  
> "the fraudulent copying of American software".
> 2. Unjustifiably claiming or being credited with particular  
> accomplishments or qualities.
> define:fraud
> 1. Wrongful or criminal deception intended to result in financial or  
> personal gain.
> 2. A person or thing intended to deceive others, typically by  
> unjustifiably claiming or being credited with accomplishments or  
> qualities.
>
> So no - you don't "have to be able to keep your customers captive" in  
> order to be fraudulent. Taking someone's else work and saying it is your  
> work is fraud, no matter how small business you are (in fact you don't  
> even have to be business for this to be fraud). Taking some work and not  
> complying with license is also fraud.

That does not change anything to the suspicion raised by an assertion like:
> There is enough evidence that fraud
> in business is a reasonable assumption.

(providing I did not erroneously understand, or else, example reasonable  
assumption would be welcome)

-- 
“Syntactic sugar causes cancer of the semi-colons.” [1]
“Structured Programming supports the law of the excluded muddle.” [1]
[1]: Epigrams on Programming — Alan J. — P. Yale University