Re: Fuzzy machine learning framework v1.2

["Zhu Qun-Ying" <zhu.qunying@gmail.com>]

On Wed, 30 May 2012 13:46:45 -0700, Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> wrote:
>>
>> Then don't use it.
>
> I don't use it. Try reading the thread instead of adding to the noise  
> level ;-)
>
>> If your code deadly need other's code to function, then respect their
>> choice of license.
>
> I don't need anybody's code to function except the OS and on UNIX, libc  
> (I
> usually use syscalls..)
>
>> You are using your definition of freedom to overtake other's thought.
>
> Let me see if I understand this. A guy from China is lecturing on the  
> topic
> of freedom? It's well-understood where I come from. The Land of the FREE  
> and
> the Home of the Brave. At least it was when I grew up...
>
>> I think RMS's GPL is more realistic to respect the author's will.  He is
>> not forcing you to use GPL for your code, he is not forcing you to use  
>> GPL
>> code neither.
>
> You keep missing the point. The point is the GPL is not a free software
> license. It's a viral, forcible open source license.
>
>> That is your definition of "free software", it is perfectly acceptable  
>> to
>> lots of people, including me to call GPL software as free software.
>
> But you're damn liars, and usually socialists and atheists, so you have  
> no
> compunction about lying, propagandizing, expropriating private property,
> bullying, and killing people who get in your way, since you have no moral
> compass.
>
> Have a nice day!

If you keep saying people disagree with you as liars, you need to serious  
consider yourself to see a psychiatrist.
Where am I coming from has nothing to do with this.  I know what's  
freedom, and in this little earth, the only place that has total freedom  
that you could do what ever you want is in your dream.


--
Qun-Ying