Re: MinGW issues with gnat

["Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57)" <yannick_duchene@yahoo.fr>]

Le Sun, 29 May 2011 23:58:07 +0200, Ludovic Brenta  
<ludovic@ludovic-brenta.org> a écrit:
> Even though it's been a long time since I had any interest in Windows, I
> do remember that Windows 2000 is a version of Windows NT
Yes, I confirm you are right Ludovic (I remembered later, but did not  
bother to correct this sentence, as anyway, later versions of GNAT were  
not made to work with Windows 2000, no more than with Windows 95/98).

Just that I believe to feel in his case, it gonna be easier to downgrade  
the compiler than to upgrade the environment, as there is little chance he  
is targeting such an OS as Windows 2000 without good reasons for that.

Please Marco, can you tell us more on the reason why you are targeting  
Windows 2000, so as we can better figure the story ? (I may guess you are  
to work on some ancient Ada source, but this is just a guess, would be  
better to be really fixed).

-- 
“Syntactic sugar causes cancer of the semi-colons.”  [Epigrams on  
Programming — Alan J. — P. Yale University]
“Structured Programming supports the law of the excluded muddle.” [Idem]
“c++; /* this makes c bigger but returns the old value */” [Anonymous]