From: "Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57)" <yannick_duchene@yahoo.fr>
Subject: Re: [Not important] the “not null” notation in Ada 2005
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 18:29:48 +0100
Date: 2011-03-25T18:29:48+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <op.vswtjyk6ule2fv@index.ici> (raw)
In-Reply-To: wcc4o6r5diu.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com
Le Fri, 25 Mar 2011 18:13:45 +0100, Robert A Duff
<bobduff@shell01.theworld.com> a écrit:
> The two languages are pretty similar, actually.
> If you want a thing, you declare type thing.
> If you want a thing-or-null you declare "Thing | Null".
Yes, the type constructors. Would have been a good idea, I agree.
--
Si les chats miaulent et font autant de vocalises bizarres, c’est pas pour
les chiens.
“ c++; /* this makes c bigger but returns the old value */ ” [Anonymous]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-25 17:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-25 15:45 [Not important] the “not null” notation in Ada 2005 Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57)
2011-03-25 15:51 ` Robert A Duff
2011-03-25 16:43 ` Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57)
2011-03-25 17:13 ` Robert A Duff
2011-03-25 17:29 ` Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57) [this message]
2011-03-26 7:02 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox