From: "Martin Krischik" <martin.krischik@noser.com>
Subject: Re: Adress => Access: types for unchecked conversion have different sizes
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 08:26:58 +0100
Date: 2011-03-14T08:26:58+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <op.vsboa8tqnt441v@n031.mshome.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: iljj8l$41e$1@munin.nbi.dk
Am 14.03.2011, 00:16 Uhr, schrieb Randy Brukardt <randy@rrsoftware.com>:
> I did, so it is of course true that portability is less important. But
> why
> use lousy Ada design in any Ada code? The only thing I can think of is
> that
> it was designed for Ada 83 -- but that doesn't make much sense for GNAT
> code.
Indeed it does not. And there is quite a lot of strange stuff going on in
the GNAT compiler.
Anyway it compiler it I remove the -m64 option. So I guess it is a problem
in handling x86_64 code. Which in turn means I will “only” be able to
create a 32 bit compiler. Ahh well, better then nothing.
Martin
--
Martin Krischik
mailto://krischik@users.sourceforge.net
https://sourceforge.net/users/krischik
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-14 7:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-12 15:08 Adress => Access: types for unchecked conversion have different sizes Martin Krischik
2011-03-12 17:00 ` Edward Fish
2011-03-12 17:05 ` Simon Wright
2011-03-13 9:35 ` Martin Krischik
2011-03-13 11:57 ` Simon Wright
2011-03-13 13:03 ` Martin Krischik
2011-03-13 3:32 ` Randy Brukardt
2011-03-13 9:47 ` Martin Krischik
2011-03-13 23:16 ` Randy Brukardt
2011-03-14 7:26 ` Martin Krischik [this message]
2011-03-14 18:40 ` Simon Wright
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox