From: "Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57)" <yannick_duchene@yahoo.fr>
Subject: Re: Loops and parallel execution
Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2011 21:10:49 +0100
Date: 2011-02-06T21:10:49+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <op.vqhzobrpule2fv@garhos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: ihvmll$6tr$1@munin.nbi.dk
Le Sat, 29 Jan 2011 01:23:13 +0100, Randy Brukardt <randy@rrsoftware.com>
a écrit:
> We already do something like this for aggregates in Janus/Ada. An
> aggregate
> assignment like:
>
> My_Str := (others => Ch)
>
> can get turned into the Intel STOSB (I think that's the right opcode)
Yes, if I remember correctly, this is precisely “rep stosb”, with a
counter in the ECX (or CX) register. Stosb alone would just update source
and destination register (SI and DI). This use, although valid, is less
common.
--
Si les chats miaulent et font autant de vocalises bizarres, c’est pas pour
les chiens.
“I am fluent in ASCII” [Warren 2010]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-06 20:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-25 15:40 Loops and parallel execution Georg Bauhaus
2011-01-25 16:37 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2011-01-25 17:36 ` Georg Bauhaus
2011-01-25 17:38 ` Georg Bauhaus
2011-01-25 21:32 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2011-01-25 22:07 ` Georg Bauhaus
2011-01-26 1:31 ` Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57)
2011-01-26 9:04 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2011-01-26 1:06 ` Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57)
2011-01-26 10:08 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2011-01-31 13:01 ` Paul Colin Gloster
2011-02-06 20:06 ` Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57)
2011-02-07 11:43 ` Nicholas Paul Collin Gloster
2011-01-26 8:46 ` Egil Høvik
2011-01-26 10:47 ` Georg Bauhaus
2011-02-14 23:27 ` Tuck
2011-02-15 21:10 ` Georg Bauhaus
2011-01-26 11:29 ` Peter C. Chapin
2011-01-26 21:57 ` Randy Brukardt
2011-01-27 23:01 ` tmoran
2011-01-29 0:23 ` Randy Brukardt
2011-02-06 20:10 ` Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57) [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox