From: "Vinzent Hoefler" <0439279208b62c95f1880bf0f8776eeb@t-domaingrabbing.de>
Subject: Re: No_Implicit_Heap_Allocations
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 19:07:22 +0100
Date: 2011-01-27T19:07:22+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <op.vpzbakfdlzeukk@jellix.jlfencey.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 185be3a1-ac6a-4def-bfca-a45916c0865a@u3g2000vbe.googlegroups.com
Maciej Sobczak wrote:
> I should not add all possible Restrictions to my library units just in
> case any of them will be some day used in a program that imposes any
> of these restrictions, right?.
1) Why don't you use a separate file for the configuration pragmas and
add this to the project instead?
2) If you do, does it make a difference?
Vinzent.
--
You know, we're sitting on four million pounds of fuel, one nuclear weapon,
and a thing that has 270,000 moving parts built by the lowest bidder.
Makes you feel good, doesn't it?
-- Rockhound, "Armageddon"
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-27 18:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-27 10:38 No_Implicit_Heap_Allocations Maciej Sobczak
2011-01-27 11:00 ` No_Implicit_Heap_Allocations Maciej Sobczak
2011-01-27 11:06 ` No_Implicit_Heap_Allocations Mark Lorenzen
2011-01-27 15:49 ` No_Implicit_Heap_Allocations Maciej Sobczak
2011-01-27 18:07 ` Vinzent Hoefler [this message]
2011-01-27 22:13 ` No_Implicit_Heap_Allocations Maciej Sobczak
2011-01-28 5:15 ` No_Implicit_Heap_Allocations Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57)
2011-01-28 15:19 ` No_Implicit_Heap_Allocations Maciej Sobczak
2011-01-28 15:38 ` No_Implicit_Heap_Allocations Mark Lorenzen
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox