From: "Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57)" <yannick_duchene@yahoo.fr>
Subject: Re: Protected Objects And Many Processors
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 21:31:23 +0100
Date: 2011-01-21T21:31:23+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <op.vpodylunule2fv@garhos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: ihcp5i$s5$1@tornado.tornevall.net
Le Fri, 21 Jan 2011 20:55:22 +0100, Jeffrey Carter
<spam.jrcarter.not@spam.not.acm.org> a écrit:
> 2. Protected functions can return indefinite types with actual values
> determined by the function; task entries are constrained to the size of
> objects provided by the caller.
Ah, I see. There is indeed nothing like a real function with tasks, and
will not allocate on the caller's stack.
But there is still room to return a reference to some dynamically
allocated memory, even indirectly, or no ? (I do not see anything which
would prohibit this, although I did not try it)
--
Si les chats miaulent et font autant de vocalises bizarres, c’est pas pour
les chiens.
“I am fluent in ASCII” [Warren 2010]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-21 20:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-21 18:09 Protected Objects And Many Processors Georg Bauhaus
2011-01-21 19:31 ` Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57)
2011-01-21 20:35 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2011-01-21 21:48 ` Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57)
2011-01-21 22:32 ` Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57)
2011-01-24 11:29 ` comp.lang.php
2011-01-24 14:53 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2011-01-21 19:55 ` Jeffrey Carter
2011-01-21 20:31 ` Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57) [this message]
2011-01-22 5:16 ` Randy Brukardt
2011-02-06 20:04 ` Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57)
2011-02-06 1:22 ` Gene
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox