Re: ANN: Ada 2005 Math Extensions, 20100810 release

["Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57)" <yannick_duchene@yahoo.fr>]

Le Sun, 15 Aug 2010 01:51:42 +0200, Georg Bauhaus  
<rm-host.bauhaus@maps.futureapps.de> a écrit:
> generic
>     type Fur is private;
> package Mechanical_Dog is
>     --subtype Fur_Of is Fur; -- eastern pidgin?
lol

>     subtype Its_Fur is Fur;
Looks like OO oriented talks. Talks about a generic instance as if it was  
an object (it is is some way). Why not, may be nice.

>     subtype Dogs_Fur is Fur;
Will change all other the time. Could not be a constant naming convention.

>     subtype Formal_Fur is Fur;
I know this one :p

>     subtype Actual_Fur is Fur;
Hmmm, looke like more friendly than Formal_Fur. I may switch to this one.

>     subtype Fur_Type is Fur;
Will clash in context where ZZZ_Type is already a naming convention for  
types (you will have Fur_Type_Type)

>     subtype Generic_Fur is Fur;
Personally don't like it. This tag the type with the word Generic instead  
of the package. And this would not be nice for people using Generic_ZZZ  
for packages (seems they are numerous) here


My vote goes to either Its_Fur or Actual_Fur (or Its_Fur_Type and  
Actual_Fur_Type).