From: "Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57)" <yannick_duchene@yahoo.fr>
Subject: Re: Ada 2012: An Oops in the new Ada amendments ? (in 10.1.2 Context Clauses - With Clauses)
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 19:43:45 +0200
Date: 2010-08-10T19:43:45+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <op.vg8gu72gule2fv@garhos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: op.vg8f6eyiule2fv@garhos
OK, sorry, I see: “library item” vs “library_item” (the underscore).
When I see this kind of things, do I have to understand this is a matter
of unformally defined item (old version) vs formally defined item (new
version) ? If this was made part of an amendment, I suppose the concern is
more than typo or formatting.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-10 17:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-10 17:28 Ada 2012: An Oops in the new Ada amendments ? (in 10.1.2 Context Clauses - With Clauses) Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57)
2010-08-10 17:43 ` Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57) [this message]
2010-08-10 17:43 ` Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57)
2010-08-10 22:32 ` Randy Brukardt
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox