Re: What is SPARK about?

["Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57)" <yannick_duchene@yahoo.fr>]

Le Sat, 12 Jun 2010 20:09:48 +0200, Claude <claude.defour@orange.fr> a  
écrit:
> Formal Methods (i.e., Z notation and SPARK) are best suited to the
> development of data oriented, sequential systems. i.e., they are
> generally sufficient to demonstrate data flow correctness and SPARK
> can prove the absence of run time error.  But on how to handle the
> functional complexities of large systems, they had always led to dead
> ends, almost.
Sure there is way to... (it must be)

Sorry for being a bit out of topic, I would like to ask you a question, as  
it seems you know about the sate of the art. Please, do you know if there  
are accessible documents about balancing intuitionistic logic vs classical  
logic in this area ?

-- 
There is even better than a pragma Assert: a SPARK --# check.
--# check C and WhoKnowWhat and YouKnowWho;
--# assert Ada;
--  i.e. forget about previous premises which leads to conclusion
--  and start with new conclusion as premise.