From: "Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57)" <yannick_duchene@yahoo.fr>
Subject: Re: License of that GNAT patch ?
Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2011 01:51:25 +0200
Date: 2011-10-06T01:51:25+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <op.v2wkjzbuule2fv@index.ici> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 4e8ce3fe$0$7625$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net
Le Thu, 06 Oct 2011 01:10:54 +0200, Georg Bauhaus
<rm.dash-bauhaus@futureapps.de> a écrit:
> Who has the right to say how to use this new, patched library?
Oops, just hope I'm OK (red-face)
> What if there is no assignment of copyright to settle ownership
> of this new work?
Don't know for GMGPL or GPL with GCC Runtime Exception, but if you want to
be sure, you may consider one of Simplified BSD or MIT licenses, which are
explicit about this case (providing I've understood your requirements).
--
“Syntactic sugar causes cancer of the semi-colons.” [Epigrams on
Programming — Alan J. — P. Yale University]
“Structured Programming supports the law of the excluded muddle.” [Idem]
Java: Write once, Never revisit
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-05 23:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-05 15:00 License of that GNAT patch ? Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57)
2011-10-05 15:37 ` Ludovic Brenta
2011-10-05 20:02 ` Georg Bauhaus
2011-10-05 20:11 ` Ludovic Brenta
2011-10-05 23:10 ` Georg Bauhaus
2011-10-05 23:51 ` Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57) [this message]
2011-10-06 7:40 ` Ludovic Brenta
2011-10-06 12:24 ` Georg Bauhaus
2011-10-06 13:02 ` Simon Wright
2011-10-06 7:13 ` Simon Wright
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox