comp.lang.ada
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Martin Krischik" <krischik@users.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: C vs. ada for embeded system
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 18:33:24 +0100
Date: 2009-03-10T18:33:24+01:00	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <op.uqk61yvwz25lew@macpro.krischik.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 74c40d98-9150-4e5e-aab0-b0b28145cb0d@a12g2000yqm.googlegroups.com

Am 09.03.2009, 17:02 Uhr, schrieb <mccormick@cs.uni.edu>:

> On Mar 7, 7:23 am, "abcd" <a...@aa.com> wrote:
>> why ada is better of  "C" language  for embeded system?

> You can seee the results of completion rates for a 10-15K line project
> done in both C and Ada in my Real-Time Embedded Systems class over the
> past 20 years.  The class runs for one semester (15 weeks).  The
> bottom line is that NO student team ever completed the minimal project
> requirements in C.  Over 80% of the teams working in Ada complted the
> project.  My latest publications on the matter are

Interesting - where the studens alowed to choose the language or was it  
forced upon them?

Do the students know before hand of the dire C results?

Martin
-- 
Martin Krischik



  reply	other threads:[~2009-03-10 17:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-03-07 12:23 C vs. ada for embeded system abcd
2009-03-07 13:16 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2009-03-07 18:12 ` Martin
2009-03-07 18:18 ` Pascal Obry
2009-03-07 18:29 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2009-03-07 19:54 ` Per Sandberg
2009-03-07 23:26 ` anon
2009-03-08 10:43 ` Pascal Obry
2009-03-09 16:02 ` mccormick
2009-03-10 17:33   ` Martin Krischik [this message]
2009-03-11 10:14     ` christoph.grein
2009-03-11 14:07     ` John McCormick
replies disabled

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox