From: "Ed Falis" <falis@verizon.net>
Subject: Re: SPARK User Group 2008
Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 21:57:43 GMT
Date: 2008-05-27T21:57:43+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <op.ubt1yiqr5afhvo@naropa> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 9SZ_j.128327$TT4.74140@attbi_s22
On Tue, 27 May 2008 16:07:33 -0400, Jeffrey R. Carter
<spam.jrcarter.not@spam.acm.org> wrote:
> Simon Wright wrote:
>> I don't understand.
>> Either you *know* that iFacts has got problems/has failed, in which
>> case *WHY DON'T YOU POST THE EVIDENCE SO WE CAN SEE IT TOO*, or you
>> *assume* that no news is bad news.
>
> Don't you recognize proof by blatant assertion?
>
One of my favorite rhetorical devices, especially when it's a peripheral
phrase in a statement about something else. Amazing how those slip under
people's radar.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-27 21:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-28 16:02 SPARK User Group 2008 roderick.chapman
2008-05-12 10:29 ` Michael
2008-05-13 7:47 ` Simon Wright
2008-05-16 6:57 ` Michael
2008-05-16 8:21 ` stefan-lucks
2008-05-16 21:41 ` Simon Wright
2008-05-25 20:14 ` Michael
2008-05-26 10:06 ` Simon Wright
2008-05-27 18:43 ` Michael
2008-05-27 19:23 ` Simon Wright
2008-05-27 20:07 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2008-05-27 21:57 ` Ed Falis [this message]
2008-05-28 9:51 ` iFACTS (was: SPARK User Group 2008) Stuart
2008-06-01 20:47 ` SPARK User Group 2008 Michael
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox