Re: C to JVM, time to revive JGNAT?

["Martin Krischik" <krischik@users.sourceforge.net>]

Am 10.08.2006, 16:26 Uhr, schrieb Dmitry A. Kazakov  
<mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de>:

> On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 13:11:02 +0300, Martin Krischik wrote:
>
>> Am 09.08.2006, 21:13 Uhr, schrieb Dmitry A. Kazakov
>> <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de>:
>
>>> Having a naked Ada compiler
>>> into anything isn't much useful. Ada's run-time library is the thing  
>>> that
>>> makes it useful.
>>
>> Let's be honest here: the Java's runtime lib is a lot more powerfull  
>> then
>> Ada's.
>
> I didn't mean GUI stuff or other things you can express in the language
> terms. I did ones you need to make, say, protected objects working.

Shure, yes, you want it both: all the Ada stuff and all the Java stuff.  
Which indeed would be cool. I too would love that.

> For example, there is a GCC backend for Tricore. Does it imply that GNAT
> can Tricore?

Tricore?!? I wikipedia it when I am home - my parents in law internet  
connection is so slooow - yawnnn.

Martin

-- 
Martin Krischik
krischik@users.sourceforge.net