Re: C to JVM, time to revive JGNAT?

["Martin Krischik" <krischik@users.sourceforge.net>]

Am 09.08.2006, 11:11 Uhr, schrieb Dmitry A. Kazakov  
<mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de>:

> AMPC (Axiomatic Multi-Platform C):
>
> http://www.axiomsol.com/

I think JGNAT, MGNAT and Interfaces.CPP are interesting technologies but  
somehow undermaintained.

While MGNAT seem to come along nicely both JGNAT and Interfaces.CPP are  
stalled on a misseing code analyzer/generator for the needed thin  
bindings. It is just to much work to create them by hand.

And a last point: the gcj (GNU Compiler for Java) is coming along nicely  
as well Interfaces.Java (interface to gcj) might be an alternative to  
JGNAT.

Sadly we don't have the man power for any of theese projects. Apart from  
MGNAT which is sponsored by teh US Air force.

Martin
-- 
Martin Krischik
krischik@users.sourceforge.net