From: "Ed Falis" <falis@verizon.net>
Subject: Re: Moving From AUnit V1 to V2
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2008 23:41:57 GMT
Date: 2008-03-16T23:41:57+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <op.t74ur6cl5afhvo@dogen.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: m2bq5e8q5k.fsf@mac.com
On Sun, 16 Mar 2008 14:44:39 -0400, Simon Wright <simon.j.wright@mac.com>
wrote:
> I didn't have any GNAT-GPL-2007 problems with AUnit 1.05 (which came
> with 2006).
>
> I hadn't (therefore) checked out AUnit 2 - but I see that AUnit 2.01
> includes notes on migrating from 1 to 2, and even a script to automate
> some of the changes. Are these notes wrong?
Yes, AUnit 1.05 is fine for use within AUnit's original design
parameters. AUnit 2.xx was intended to address usage under constrained
run-time environments, for example no exception propagation or dynamic
allocation. This change required a certain amount of interface change,
though we tried to limit it insofar as possible.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-16 23:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-16 2:51 Moving From AUnit V1 to V2 Michael Rohan
2008-03-16 11:14 ` Peter C. Chapin
2008-03-16 17:07 ` Ed Falis
2008-03-17 0:06 ` Peter C. Chapin
2008-03-17 13:35 ` Ed Falis
2008-03-17 19:24 ` Michael Rohan
2008-03-17 20:44 ` Simon Wright
2008-03-16 18:44 ` Simon Wright
2008-03-16 23:41 ` Ed Falis [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox