From: "Jeffrey R. Carter" <spam.jrcarter.not@spam.acm.org>
Subject: Re: Question on initialization of packages
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 18:29:40 GMT
Date: 2008-06-17T18:29:40+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ooT5k.158344$TT4.118755@attbi_s22> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <wcc3ancdm6f.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
Robert A Duff wrote:
>
> True, but it's still safe to use it. On GNAT, it works,
> and on other implementations (which don't support it),
> it does nothing.
Sure, but then
pragma Almost_Anything_You_Want [(...)];
can be used with any compiler. Saying "we have a pragma X" implies that it's
part of the standard. "GNAT has a compiler-specific pragma X" is a better way to
phrase it.
--
Jeff Carter
"I'm a kike, a yid, a heebie, a hook nose! I'm Kosher,
Mum! I'm a Red Sea pedestrian, and proud of it!"
Monty Python's Life of Brian
77
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-17 18:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-17 8:07 Question on initialization of packages Reinert Korsnes
2008-06-17 8:50 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2008-06-17 9:14 ` Reinert Korsnes
2008-06-17 10:26 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2008-06-17 12:03 ` Reinert Korsnes
2008-06-17 14:12 ` Martin
2008-06-17 10:39 ` Georg Bauhaus
2008-06-17 16:41 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2008-06-17 17:08 ` Robert A Duff
2008-06-17 17:33 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2008-06-17 18:29 ` Jeffrey R. Carter [this message]
2008-06-17 10:18 ` christoph.grein
2008-06-17 14:29 ` Robert A Duff
2008-06-17 16:39 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox