From: "Randy Brukardt" <randy@rrsoftware.com>
Subject: Re: Lightweight tasks to implement co-routines?
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2017 23:56:21 -0500
Date: 2017-07-31T23:56:21-05:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <olp1lm$ui8$1@franka.jacob-sparre.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: olo5rp$dp0$1@gioia.aioe.org
"Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> wrote in message
news:olo5rp$dp0$1@gioia.aioe.org...
> On 2017-07-31 20:08, Victor Porton wrote:
...
> I have a vague idea that it should be an entry of some ad-hoc fake
> protected object that would glue both calls together, or maybe an entry of
> the "carrier" task. But I don't know how to make this easy to use and
> encapsulated without exposing to other contexts.
Tucker Taft is proposing a construct called a "channel" for this purpose. It
sounds interesting, but there are so few details it is impossible to tell.
There is an AI for it (AI12-0197-4), but it is empty pending a real proposal
from Tucker.
Randy.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-01 4:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-31 18:08 Lightweight tasks to implement co-routines? Victor Porton
2017-07-31 20:00 ` Simon Wright
2017-07-31 21:01 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2017-08-01 4:56 ` Randy Brukardt [this message]
2017-08-01 6:47 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2017-08-01 4:53 ` Randy Brukardt
2017-08-01 6:49 ` Paul Rubin
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox