From: "Randy Brukardt" <randy@rrsoftware.com>
Subject: Re: bug compiler ?
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2017 13:20:34 -0500
Date: 2017-06-30T13:20:34-05:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <oj64pj$j2b$1@franka.jacob-sparre.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: c47d5433-8eb5-4dde-99f9-173f7dded62c@googlegroups.com
"AdaMagica" <christ-usch.grein@t-online.de> wrote in message
news:c47d5433-8eb5-4dde-99f9-173f7dded62c@googlegroups.com...
> Just a guess: Maybe the compiler treats this simple statement function as
> having convention intrinsic. Intrinsic functions have no address and
> therefore no access is possible.
> Whether this is legal - check the RM - I'm too lazy.
It's legal. Expression functions aren't Intrinsic, they're just a short-hand
for a usual function call. So this should be fine, and it seems that
whatever is going on is not fine, so it is a compiler bug.
Randy.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-30 18:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-30 8:49 bug compiler ? bbaborum
2017-06-30 11:09 ` Lucretia
2017-06-30 14:49 ` Anh Vo
2017-06-30 15:03 ` Anh Vo
2017-06-30 18:47 ` Simon Wright
2017-06-30 19:42 ` Anh Vo
2017-07-02 16:43 ` bbaborum
2017-07-02 16:42 ` bbaborum
2017-06-30 15:11 ` AdaMagica
2017-06-30 18:20 ` Randy Brukardt [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox