* [OT]
2005-08-19 17:55 ` Adrian Knoth
@ 2005-08-20 6:36 ` Randy
2005-08-20 12:58 ` [OT] Larry Kilgallen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Randy @ 2005-08-20 6:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
Adrian Knoth wrote:
>
> BTW: your postings sucks pretty much: no valid From, non-unique
> message-ID (no fqdn). Perhaps you can correct this.
>
Could someone explain what he is talking about here?
I am afraid I don't know.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [OT]
2005-08-20 6:36 ` [OT] Randy
@ 2005-08-20 12:58 ` Larry Kilgallen
2005-08-20 19:48 ` [OT] Randy
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Larry Kilgallen @ 2005-08-20 12:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
In article <tbANe.159$Vg7.100@trnddc06>, Randy <abuse@127.0.0.1> writes:
> Adrian Knoth wrote:
>> BTW: your postings sucks pretty much: no valid From, non-unique
>> message-ID (no fqdn). Perhaps you can correct this.
>
> Could someone explain what he is talking about here?
> I am afraid I don't know.
Sometimes I help to interpret, but not when the person being unclear
cannot bother to use civil language.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [OT]
2005-08-20 12:58 ` [OT] Larry Kilgallen
@ 2005-08-20 19:48 ` Randy
2005-08-20 20:25 ` [OT] Adrian Knoth
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Randy @ 2005-08-20 19:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
Larry Kilgallen wrote:
> In article <tbANe.159$Vg7.100@trnddc06>, Randy <abuse@127.0.0.1> writes:
>
>>Adrian Knoth wrote:
>
>
>>>BTW: your postings sucks pretty much: no valid From, non-unique
>>> message-ID (no fqdn). Perhaps you can correct this.
>>
>>Could someone explain what he is talking about here?
>>I am afraid I don't know.
>
>
> Sometimes I help to interpret, but not when the person being unclear
> cannot bother to use civil language.
Yes, I hear you. I thought he was quite rude for no reason.
I just don't know if he even has a valid point.
I'm wondering why he was looking at the header instead of the message.
Maybe he is some hacker looking for a person's ID to steal. Who knows.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [OT]
2005-08-20 19:48 ` [OT] Randy
@ 2005-08-20 20:25 ` Adrian Knoth
2005-08-20 22:44 ` [OT] Randy
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Adrian Knoth @ 2005-08-20 20:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
Randy <abuse@127.0.0.1> wrote:
>>>>BTW: your postings sucks pretty much: no valid From, non-unique
>>>> message-ID (no fqdn). Perhaps you can correct this.
>>>Could someone explain what he is talking about here?
>>>I am afraid I don't know.
>> Sometimes I help to interpret, but not when the person being unclear
>> cannot bother to use civil language.
> Yes, I hear you. I thought he was quite rude for no reason.
I'm sorry, I never intended to be rude. I'm not a native speaker
and I don't know that "sucks" is so negative. My intention was
to only state that there are some points which could be improved.
Though I prefer complete From-lines and especially a valid
reply-to-address (which would let me tell all those things by
mail instead of disturbing the audience with it), the real
point to critizize is the violation of RFC850.
I think you're completely new to usenet so I guess you don't
know what I'm talking about. Actually it isn't even your fault,
your software is doing wrong.
If you read <http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc850.html> and especially
2.1.7 you'll see that your message-id *must* contain a real
domain name. Yours (trnddc03) isn't sufficient.
The sense of putting a valid domain name there is to guarantee
the uniqueness of message-ids. That's important to identify
every single posting all over the world. Any collision would
break the primary key property. It's like two persons sharing the
same name: you're always getting into trouble when referring
to one of them ;)
> I'm wondering why he was looking at the header instead of
> the message. Maybe he is some hacker looking for a person's
> ID to steal. Who knows.
You're kidding?
--
mail: adi@thur.de http://adi.thur.de PGP: v2-key via keyserver
Man kann gar nicht so viel essen wie man kotzen m�chte!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [OT]
2005-08-20 20:25 ` [OT] Adrian Knoth
@ 2005-08-20 22:44 ` Randy
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Randy @ 2005-08-20 22:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
> Though I prefer complete From-lines and especially a valid
> reply-to-address (which would let me tell all those things by
> mail instead of disturbing the audience with it), the real
> point to critizize is the violation of RFC850.
>
> I think you're completely new to usenet so I guess you don't
> know what I'm talking about. Actually it isn't even your fault,
> your software is doing wrong.
>
OK Mozilla, Thunderbird and outlook express all do the same thing. I am
guessing that my mail programs either are all "in violation" or that my ISP
makes up the message ID. Either way it seems to be out of my hands.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [OT]
[not found] <0f8a815a-018f-4968-84d2-3ae1bad17175@googlegroups.com>
@ 2017-05-31 14:51 ` Mr. Man-wai Chang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Mr. Man-wai Chang @ 2017-05-31 14:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
On 31/5/2017 1:42 AM, aminer68@gmail.com wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Here is my new arab poem in english and in french:
> Please read it carefully:
> https://sites.google.com/site/aminer68/my-poem
> Please read it listening at the same time at this beautiful music of
> Vangelis, to be more beautiful:
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=55SVonv-sio
Do you feel your mind controlled by ISIS? :)
--
@~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!!
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty!
/( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you!
^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3
不借貸! 不詐騙! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA):
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-05-31 14:51 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <0f8a815a-018f-4968-84d2-3ae1bad17175@googlegroups.com>
2017-05-31 14:51 ` [OT] Mr. Man-wai Chang
2005-08-19 16:35 basic ada question Randy
2005-08-19 17:55 ` Adrian Knoth
2005-08-20 6:36 ` [OT] Randy
2005-08-20 12:58 ` [OT] Larry Kilgallen
2005-08-20 19:48 ` [OT] Randy
2005-08-20 20:25 ` [OT] Adrian Knoth
2005-08-20 22:44 ` [OT] Randy
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox